Ever since the Bill O’Reilly days of Fox News, waging the War on Christmas has been a holiday tradition for the left, as defending the traditions of Western civilizations has been for the right.
Here is Bill back in 2007 declaring victory, perhaps a bit prematurely, over the “forces of darkness” waging jihad against the annual celebration of the birth of Jesus.
Sadly, Bill got taken off of the air over a series of salacious #MeToo sex scandals involving a shower “falafel” (a term he apparently mistook for “loofah”) back in 2017, but the war has raged on without its old war horse.
Here are some of the highlights from this year’s war (so far).
Santa goes trans-racial, differently-abled
Rachel Dolezal, you might recall, a ginger lady as white as the driven snow on Christmas Eve, got in a lot of trouble for transing herself into a black BLM activist some time ago.
So, we thought we had the grounds rules established, nonsensical as they might be: men can become women by simply clicking their heels and saying so, and denying them their God-given right to become ladies is a hate crime, but trans-racialism is clearly off the table.
Apparently, though, an exception has been carved out for Santa Claus, who can never be colorful or gay enough.
Turning Santa Claus into a non-binary Person of Color™ with various disabilities and a penchant for sodomy has long been a social engineering project for the Social Justice™ movement, but it’s reached an apex.
This year, they seem to have really gone all out to turn Santa into an African-American. Black Santas are everywhere. And now they have disabilities too, for Inclusion™ and Equity™ and Diversity™.
Target, for instance, is selling a “Santa Fabric Christmas Figurine in Wheelchair Holding Gift” figurine.
“Saw the negative [Fox] news coverage about this item and immediately came online to buy it. Representation is SO important and as someone who works with patients of all abilities, I love it!” wrote one reviewer.
While it might be great “representation” for people in wheelchairs, and I would never want to take that away, the wheelchair Santa does present some logistical challenges, like how he’s going to shimmy down a chimney if he can’t move his legs.
Santa’s not the only beloved Christmas icon who’s gone intersectional.
Plus, the Nutcrackers are wielding Pride flags now.
Target outdid itself this year for Christmas pic.twitter.com/F0YpLmOrkt
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 15, 2023
The Black Santa icon has since been dubbed “Z’nta Qlaus” online, in honor of his pseudo-African roots.
Hey Look It’s Z’nta Qlaus…. pic.twitter.com/3LYgge2819
— 𝕰𝖒𝕲 (@Emilio2763) November 19, 2023
As this commenter noted, they even dyed his beard black!
Santa is an old, jolly man; his hair is white to reflect that reality.
Even if Santa were black, which he’s not and never has been historically, his beard would still be white in old age. But that would make him a domestic terrorist, apparently.
So it’s all got to be black.
Via Britannica:
The Dutch are credited with transporting the legend of Saint Nicholas (Sinterklaas) to New Amsterdam (now New York City), along with the custom of giving gifts and sweets to children on his feast day, December 6. The current depiction of Santa Claus is based on images drawn by cartoonist Thomas Nast for Harper’s Weekly beginning in 1863. Nast’s Santa owed much to the description given in the poem “A Visit from St. Nicholas” (also known as “’Twas the Night Before Christmas”), first published in 1823. The image was further defined by the popular Santa Claus advertisements created for the Coca-Cola Company from 1931 by illustrator Haddon Sundblum. Sundblum’s Santa was a portly white-bearded gentleman dressed in a red suit with a black belt and white fur trim, black boots, and a soft red cap.
Until the recent wave of migration into Europe, the Dutch were universally white. So we’re going to have to ask the question: are these people transing Santa Claus into a black man committing the unforgiveable hate crime of “cultural appropriation”? Or can satanic whites only commit that one, because Equity™?
