Anyone vaguely acquainted with medical ethics understands that the primacy of informed consent is fundamental to protecting the rights of patients and preventing the kind of medical experimentation performed under, among other brutal regimes, the Nazis.
Via American Medical Association (emphasis added):
Informed consent to medical treatment is fundamental in both ethics and law. Patients have the right to receive information and ask questions about recommended treatments so that they can make well-considered decisions about care. Successful communication in the patient-physician relationship fosters trust and supports shared decision making.
The process of informed consent occurs when communication between a patient and physician results in the patient’s authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention.
In layman’s terms, medical authorities don’t get to do whatever they want to human patients like they’re farm animals, which is a very inconvenient impediment to biomedical totalitarianism that the likes of the CDC, FDA, WHO, et al. deeply aspire to.
Related: WEF Propagates ‘Disease X’ Narrative, Alleges 20 Times Deadlier Than COVID
They’ve won a major victory recently in that pursuit.
Via Federal Register (emphasis added);
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to implement a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act). This final rule allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject and includes appropriate safeguards to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of human subjects. The final rule permits an institutional review board (IRB) to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent, under limited conditions, for certain FDA-regulated minimal risk clinical investigations.
Not asking any questions about what the pharmaceutical and medical industry is doing to you is how you best Respect the Science™. God forbid, further, that you ever find yourself endowed with the audacity to “do your own research,” which is uncouth and very much the purview of domestic terrorist conspiracy theorist white supremacists or whatever.
Outdated and irrelevant informed consent would apply, for instance, to the myocarditis draft alert that the CDC disregarded in May 2021 while it was pushing the “safe and effective” lie on the public for the benefit of Pfizer, Moderna, and stakeholders within the Public Health™ bureaucracy.
Via The Epoch Times (emphasis added):
The CDC sends alerts to federal, state, and local public health officials and doctors across the nation through a system called the Health Alert Network (HAN). Messaging through the system conveys “vital health information,” according to the CDC.
In May 2021, CDC officials drafted an alert on myocarditis and the two most widely used COVID-19 shots, according to the newly obtained document, which is being made public for the first time by The Epoch Times.
“This is the most recent draft of an alert as discussed. Happy to discuss,” Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, the CDC’s top official for equity in COVID-19 data and engagement, told two other high-ranking CDC colleagues in the email.
It was titled “draft alert on myocarditis and mRNA vaccines.
